A ‘January Surprise’?…Will the President ‘buy’ the election?….and more!


Check this out from Free Republic!!!!……

JANUARY SURPRISE: IS OBAMA PREPARING A TRILLION DOLLAR, MASS REFINANCING OF MORTGAGES?

This could be just the beginning. If President Barack Obama’s legally dodgy appointment of Richard Cordray to head the consumer finance agency should stick, it may open the door to more such actions. Here’s Jaret Seiberg of the Washington Research Group:

To us, the most important takeaway from a recess appointment of Cordray is that the President could use this same maneuver to put a housing advocate in charge of FHFA.

And why is that important? The Federal Housing Finance Agency is the regulator and conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. And the FHFA currently has an acting director, Edward DeMarco. If Obama replaces him with a “housing advocate” via the same recess appointment process, here’s what might happen next, according to Seiberg:

That could lead to a mass refinancing program for agency-backed mortgages that would go well beyond the existing HARP program. That could hurt agency MBS pricing and result in higher financing costs going forward. Yet it also could be a big boost for the economy and housing going into the election.

Indeed, my sources tell me the Obama administration has been eager to implement just such a plan, but needs to have its own man heading the FHFA to make it happen. The plan would be modeled after one originally devised by Columbia University economists Glenn Hubbard (a campaign adviser to Mitt Romney and AEI visiting scholar) and Christopher Mayer. In recent congressional testimony, Mayer described how the mass refinancing plan would work:

Under our plan, every homeowner with a GSE mortgage can refinance his or her mortgage with a new mortgage at a current fixed of 4.20 percent or less. … To qualify, the homeowner must be current on his or her mortgage or become so for at least three months. … Other than being current, we would impose no other qualification or application, except for the intention to accept the new rate (that is, no appraisal, no income verification, no tax returns, etc.).

Mayer estimates that some $3.7 trillion of mortgages would be refinanced. That’s right, this would be the Mother of All Mortgage Refinancing Plans. It would help roughly 30 million borrowers save $75 billion to $80 billion a year. As Mayer puts it: “This plan would function like a long-­lasting tax cut for these 25 or 30 million American families.”

On his website, Hubbard says the plan would have an immediate fixed cost to the government of $121 billion. And he calculates the economic impact as follows:

1. We estimate that 72 percent of owner occupant homeowners would be eligible to refinance at no cost to them. Their monthly mortgage payments would fall by an average of $355, for a total national fiscal injection $7.1 billion each month.

2. The typical borrower would reduce his or her principal and interest payments by about $350 dollars, a total reduction in mortgage payments of nearly $100 billion per year.

3. The macroeconomic stimulus effect should also include an additional housing wealth effect. At the low end of our estimates, improved mortgage market operations would reduce house price declines by 10 percent. With an estimated aggregate housing valuation of about $18 trillion, housing wealth would increase about $1.8 trillion relative to what it might fall to without this program. If we assume a relatively low marginal propensity to consume out of housing wealth of 3.5 percent, U.S. consumption would rise by $63 billion relative to what would otherwise have occurred.

4. Combining these estimates gives a total macroeconomic stimulus of as $118 billion per year in lower mortgage payments and any new consumer spending due to a housing wealth effect. In addition to the direct macroeconomic stimulus, jump-starting the stalled housing market will increase employment in a variety of industries that depend on housing transactions (mortgage and real estate brokers, home supply companies, moving companies, etc.) as well as increase the efficiency of the labor market by reducing impediments to households moving to take another job.

Bottom line: Talk about a political and economic game changer in this presidential election year. Obama could offer a trillion-dollar stimulus — as measured over a decade –that would directly and immediately impact tens of millions of Americans suffering from the housing depression. Cash in their pockets. Imagine the electoral impact on key states, such as Florida, suffering from both high unemployment and devastated housing markets.

And the beauty part for Obama? He wouldn’t need approval from Congress to do it. Even though many Republicans would scream that the plan would reward irresponsible homeowners who took on too much leverage — indeed, talk of a housing bailout is what launched the Tea Party movement – they probably couldn’t stop it. And Hubbard already has an answer to the moral hazard issue: “This proposal requires borrowers to give up a share of future appreciation in order to participate. Lenders must eat a portion of the losses as well. Everyone gives a little bit.”

The 2012 battle for the White House is looking razor close. A mass refinancing plan might be enough to tip it to Obama.

This doesn’t surprise me one bit! THIS President is beyond NOTHING when it comes to his hold on the Oval Office! You can also expect bits and pieces of so called “good news” on the economic front. Conveniently and precisely placed as to create a smokescreen of improvement. The unemployment numbers, consumer spending, etc. Personally, I put absolutely no faith in “improving” unemployment numbers as the President continues his sham of economic policies. Ask yourself just what has this administration done to warrant credit for ANY improvement?….The answer: NOTHING!

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

CRITIC’S CORNER: ‘VAMPIRE DIARIES’, ‘GREY’S ANATOMY’ – Robert Bianco @ USA Today

'Diaries' Paul Wesley

Trouble’s afoot on CW’s Vampire Diaries (tonight, 8 ET/PT), as Stefan’s decision to hide the coffins containing the bodies of Klaus’ family has sent Klaus on an even more violent than usual rampage.

It’s all in an effort to force Stefan to give the bodies back. You have to admit, that’s a plot you won’t find on many series.

'Grey's' Sandra Oh

ABC’s Grey’s Anatomy (9 ET/PT) picks up from November’s well-done cliffhanger as the hospital deals with the aftermath of the car crash (that great, eerie final image from the last episode), and Cristina deals with the aftermath of Henry’s death.

And for Cristina, that’s compounded by an important complication: Teddy still doesn’t know her husband is dead.

'Circle's' Harold

Hunter‘s Stepfanie Kramer guests on The Secret Circle(CW, 9 ET/PT) as Charles’ (Gale Harold) mother.

Her granddaughter is pleased to see her. Her son, not so much.

At 10, CBS and NBC are in repeats and ABC offersPrivate Practice (10 ET/PT), a show where a great cast continues to be abused by terrible scripts.

Note to the networks and producers of scripted programs: If you don’t want people to turn to schlock like the return of (yeesh) Jersey Shore (MTV,10 ET/PT), give them a better reason not to.


Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s